<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MuzikaBlog.com - Blogging about music &#187; metal heads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muzikablog.com/tag/metal-heads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muzikablog.com</link>
	<description>Blogging about music that fits your brainwaves...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The 69 eyes; money making wannabe’s?</title>
		<link>http://www.muzikablog.com/2009/04/06/the-69-eyes-money-making-wannabe%e2%80%99s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muzikablog.com/2009/04/06/the-69-eyes-money-making-wannabe%e2%80%99s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Octave Shaper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bands & music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blessed be]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal heads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the 69 eyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[type o negative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muzikablog.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around 6 years ago, I bought &#8216;The 69 Eyes&#8217; album &#8216;Blessed Be&#8217;.  The only reason I bought this album, is because I noticed that they really tried hard to look like Type O Negative.  Since I had never heard them, thought it might be a good investment, which wasn&#8217;t.  From the album&#8217;s artwork, their style and image, one can clearly smell Type O wannabe!
The music, lyrics and atmosphere are nowhere near Type O&#8217;s.  Without any offense, they would have done a better job if they formed a tribute Type O ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Around 6 years ago, I bought &#8216;The 69 Eyes&#8217; album &#8216;Blessed Be&#8217;.  The only reason I bought this album, is because I noticed that they really tried hard to look like Type O Negative.  Since I had never heard them, thought it might be a good investment, which wasn&#8217;t.  From the album&#8217;s artwork, their style and image, one can clearly smell Type O wannabe!</p>
<p>The music, lyrics and atmosphere are nowhere near Type O&#8217;s.  Without any offense, they would have done a better job if they formed a tribute Type O band.</p>
<p>I also just checked their official website.  They changed, and how!  It seems they dress like old school metalheads, say Motorhead style, and switched to a more heavy tone.  They are more busy looking at the mirror and caring about their image.  How cool can it be nowadays, taking pictures showing off you middle finger?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.muzikablog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/69eyes.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-68" title="69eyes" src="http://www.muzikablog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/69eyes.gif" alt="69eyes" width="176" height="208" /></a></p>
<p>From their discography, one can also notice that they spent a lot of time releasing more singles, and cd this and album that than they  have songs, instead of writing good music!</p>
<p>For sure I would not go for another &#8216;The 69 Eyes&#8217; album. Also, some people ask &#8216;What&#8217;s in a name?&#8217; Fine agreed, but for God&#8217;s sake, couldn&#8217;t you find a more &#8216;normal&#8217; name for your band?  Is the number 69 so cool for a band&#8217;s name?  Most probably it helps attracting metal kiddies, which automatically helps the band making more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muzikablog.com/2009/04/06/the-69-eyes-money-making-wannabe%e2%80%99s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
